<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polimania &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomgoldsmith.com/tag/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomgoldsmith.com</link>
	<description>Observations from just beyond the beltway</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:46:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Memo to Michael Steele</title>
		<link>http://www.tomgoldsmith.com/2009/02/08/memo-to-michael-steele/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tomgoldsmith.com/2009/02/08/memo-to-michael-steele/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TomInReston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomgoldsmith.com/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is NOT a deep thought.
No amount of incentives to businesses will create jobs.
Businesses will create jobs when and only when they need the workers to meet the demand for their products and services, regardless of what incentives are (or are not) in place.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is NOT a deep thought.</p>
<p>No amount of incentives to businesses will create jobs.</p>
<p>Businesses will create jobs when and only when they need the workers to meet the demand for their products and services, regardless of what incentives are (or are not) in place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tomgoldsmith.com/2009/02/08/memo-to-michael-steele/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For crying out loud. They&#8217;re trying to fix this mess.</title>
		<link>http://www.tomgoldsmith.com/2009/02/07/for-crying-out-loud-theyre-fixing-the-mess-you-made/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tomgoldsmith.com/2009/02/07/for-crying-out-loud-theyre-fixing-the-mess-you-made/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TomInReston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomgoldsmith.com/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i&#8217;m watching the travesty called the United State Senate, and right now I&#8217;d like to abolish it altogether and ship the whole crew &#8212; from whining Republicans to spineless Democrats to idiot staffers &#8212; to a desert island somewhere. Then they could bask in the company of one another and let the rest of us [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m watching the travesty called the United State Senate, and right now I&#8217;d like to abolish it altogether and ship the whole crew &#8212; from whining Republicans to spineless Democrats to idiot staffers &#8212; to a desert island somewhere. Then they could bask in the company of one another and let the rest of us get around to fixing the mess they&#8217;ve helped make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tomgoldsmith.com/2009/02/07/for-crying-out-loud-theyre-fixing-the-mess-you-made/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;L&#8221; Word</title>
		<link>http://www.tomgoldsmith.com/2009/01/25/the-l-word/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tomgoldsmith.com/2009/01/25/the-l-word/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TomInReston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomgoldsmith.com/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every now and then, there is an op-ed worth reading.
Author Timothy Garton Ash, a fellow at St. Antony’s College, Oxford, and the Hoover Institution at Stanford, looks at the debasement of the word &#8220;liberal,&#8221; and while the word itself may have been marginalized, the concepts it once embodied are a part of the fabric of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every now and then, there is an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/opinion/25gartonash-1.html?_r=1" target="_blank">op-ed worth reading</a>.</p>
<p>Author Timothy Garton Ash, a fellow at St. Antony’s College, Oxford, and the Hoover Institution at Stanford, looks at the debasement of the word &#8220;liberal,&#8221; and while the word itself may have been marginalized, the concepts it once embodied are a part of the fabric of America. Referring to a conference on the subject, here is what Ash writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>Faced with this worldwide conceptual cacophony, some at the conference argued that we should abandon the term, or at least dismantle it into component parts with plainer meanings. But combinations and balances belong to liberalism’s defining essence, and the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. As the Oxford political theorist Michael Freeden observed, if just one of the necessary components — for example, the free market — dominates, then the result can be illiberalism. The vital, never-ending debate over liberalism is not just over its indispensable ingredients, but also over their form, proportion and relation to one another.</p>
<p>A plausible minimum list of ingredients for 21st century liberalism would include liberty under law, limited and accountable government, markets, tolerance, some version of individualism and universalism, and some notion of human equality, reason and progress. The mix of ingredients differs from place to place. Whether some distant cousin really belongs to the extended family of liberalisms is a matter of healthy dispute. But somewhere in this contested, evolving combination there is a thing of enduring value.</p>
<p>This has been an American argument, some would say <span class="italic">the </span>American argument, for more than 200 years. In fact, the United States is still full of liberals, both progressive or left liberals and, I would insist, conservative or right liberals. Most of them just don’t use the word. Liberalism is the American love that dare not speak its name.</p></blockquote>
<p>The ideology that goes by the name of conservatism in America has been thoroughly and publicly discredited. The question is what new &#8220;flavor&#8221; of liberalism will emerge, and what will we call that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tomgoldsmith.com/2009/01/25/the-l-word/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deadenders</title>
		<link>http://www.tomgoldsmith.com/2009/01/24/deadenders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tomgoldsmith.com/2009/01/24/deadenders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 01:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TomInReston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomgoldsmith.com/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess there always will be some who have their own identities so tied up in an ideology they can&#8217;t let go.
Still, I don&#8217;t understand.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess there always will be some who have their own identities so tied up in an ideology <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/113962/Obama-Starts-Job-Approval.aspx" target="_blank">they can&#8217;t let go</a>.</p>
<p>Still, I don&#8217;t understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tomgoldsmith.com/2009/01/24/deadenders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pay attention and learn</title>
		<link>http://www.tomgoldsmith.com/2009/01/23/pay-attention-and-learn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tomgoldsmith.com/2009/01/23/pay-attention-and-learn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TomInReston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomgoldsmith.com/?p=68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Obama Administration:
If it hasn&#8217;t occurred to you yet, this is why you wait until your opponents have a chance to complain before you compromise.
Did you really think they&#8217;d accept your first offer? Jeesh.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Obama Administration:</p>
<p>If it hasn&#8217;t occurred to you yet, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/22/AR2009012203961.html?hpid=topnews" target="_blank">this is why you wait</a> until your opponents have a chance to complain<em> before </em>you compromise.</p>
<p>Did you really think they&#8217;d accept your first offer? Jeesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tomgoldsmith.com/2009/01/23/pay-attention-and-learn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
